URBAN RENEWAL ADVISORY GROUP
DRAFTING DIRECTIONS TO STAFF
January 15, 2008
PROPOSED RECOMMENDATION 1:
The River District should be expanded by approximately 54 contiguous acres, reserving up to seven acres for possible island district or districts.
URAG Directions to Staff:
PROPOSED RECOMMENDATION 2:
DTWF/SPB 2018 Budgets as proposed with referral to budget process for any line item adjustments.
PROPOSED RECOMMENDATION 3:
DTWF/SPB Budget Alternatives:
URAG Directions to Staff:
PROPOSED RECOMMENDATION 4:
Maximum Indebtedness for River District should increase by $311M for debt proceeds through 2020. Combined with the current $225M MI, this creates a new overall MI of $536M. The new $536M MI minus the $119M already spent leaves $417M in available debt or approximately $390M net of financing costs for projects.
URAG Directions to Staff:
Proposed Recommendation 5:
Following the completion of the Westside Study, PDC in collaboration with the Office of Management and Finance should initiate a process to downsize DTWF and SPB as may be appropriate and fiscally feasible.
URAG Directions to Staff:
Proposed Recommendation 6:
Following the completion of the Westside Study, PDC should host a stakeholder group to discuss options for the formation of one or more new downtown urban renewal areas (e.g., Lincoln HS, PSU, Con-Way Site). Discussions should include the need to set close-out strategies that include parameters on any new districts (e.g., real limits on MI, duration limits and specific close-out dates).
URAG Directions to Staff:
Proposed Reccommendation 7:
Following the completion of the Westside Study, PDC should host a stakeholder group to create a Downtown Transition Plan with interim development strategies to ensure adequate consideration of the following community needs pending the completion of the Central Portland Plan Update:
URAG Directions:
ADDITIONAL URAG DIRECTION
New Proposed Recommendation:
The Advisory Group agreed with Commissioner Cogen’s proposal [link to Jeff’s draft language] that the group recommend a more definitive and formal role in the process of creating a new district or expanding an existing district. The Advisory Group directed staff to work with Commissioner Cogen to craft language for the URAG’s recommendation on this topic.
Request for Additional Information:
Responding to concerns raised by the League of Women Voters, the Advisory Group directed staff to complete a detailed analysis of the fiscal impacts of its recommendation to increase the River District’s maximum indebtedness. Specifically, the Advisory Group wanted to know more about the impact on taxing jurisdictions.